#WalkAway from Fr. Martin

I haven’t been paying much attention to the world at large lately. Too much family business going on. This, however, popped up on my Facebook page a couple of days back. I’d heard the name Straka but really didn’t know what was going on, so I decided to give it a look.

You’re going to need to do some reading here, because I’m not going to pull this whole thing apart and I wouldn’t want you to miss one amazing thing in it:  https://www.theepochtimes.com/viral-walk-away-videos-highlight-growing-movement-of-democrats-leaving-the-party_2578446.html

Also, you need to watch this video:  


I think these are an answer to my prayers, and while the article has everything to do with what’s happening in the good ol’ U-S-of-A, it’s also happening within the Catholic Church.  Don’t get too caught up in the Republican/Democrat thing. Look at the similarity of what’s going on in the Catholic Church, and just swap out “Democrats” with “Fr. James Martin, SJ, Fr. Rosica, Fr. Reese, New Ways Ministry, NAGLDM, the National catholic Reporter, America Magazine, etc., etc., etc.” Seriously, they use the same manipulations.  In the name of love, they sow hate, fear, jealousy, hopelessness, and division. And, just like in the larger USA, people are starting to tire of it – in the world of Christianity at large, as well as in the Catholic Church. 

Look, you can only keep the lie up so long, and then people are going to figure out they’re being played. While Straka has just come to this realization, the other half of society has seen this all as the logical conclusion because, well, history. Same goes for the Church. At some point, the truth is going to hit them, then some of those people are going to take a chance, become emboldened, and speak the truth. 

Fr. Martin has already started to have that problem, which is why the frenzied defense on his behalf. Eventually, that tiny hole in the dam will become an all-out breach, and hopefully sooner rather than later. The question is, who’s going to be the person to be brave and take a chance in the Catholic Church? Certainly, it’s been attempted by people who believe in the teachings of the Church wholeheartedly. What I want to know is, who is going to be the one who is struggling with them who is going to no longer allow themselves to be a pawn? Who is going to break the dam and let the truth pour out? 

There are no two people on this earth who are going to agree on everything. In matters of Faith and morals, this is unfortunately apparent. No, I don’t believe that “gay marriage” is a right or is right. This doesn’t mean I hate YOU, reject YOU, or want YOU to disappear from the planet. This is ridiculous, but it’s what Fr. Martin and his club want you to believe. It means I believe I know what God wants for marriage via the Church teachings, yet you believe differently. Deal. Do you hate me because I believe differently?  I hope not, and I’m going to give you the benefit of the doubt when you say “No H8.”  Why would you not afford me (and more importantly, the Catholic Church) the same benefit when we say we love you?

Look at this quote from Brandon Straka:

But it’s really the minorities in America who don’t feel like we have a choice. That’s what they keep telling us over and over: “You’re not safe on the right. They don’t want you on the right. They hate you on the right. You’re only safe with us. We are here to protect you.”

Meanwhile, are you kidding me? You’re here to ‘protect’ me? All you are doing is use my fears to scare the [expletive] out of me—to terrify me and to try to manipulate the way that I vote.

Let’s say you are someone suffering from same-sex-attraction and struggling with being Catholic or even struggling with Christianity at large.  Can’t you see the same quote coming from Fr.Martin and the minions?

But it’s really the minorities in the Catholic Church who don’t feel like we have a choice.  That’s why they (Martin and the minions) keep telling us over and over: “You’re not safe in the Church.  They don’t want you in the Church.  They hate you in the Church.  You’re only accepted with us.  We are here to protect you.”

Meanwhile, are you kidding me? You’re here to ‘protect’ me? All you are doing is use my fears to scare the [expletive] out of me—to terrify me and to try to manipulate my faith.

Many of us have been saying this is exactly what Fr. Martin and his cronies have been doing for quite a while. I’m just hoping my counterparts on what we’re told is “the other side” will finally see that we are being pitted against each other. This is why they are always playing the “you/them” card instead of the “us” card.

So, again, no, I don’t agree with Brandon Straka on everything – not even close.  If you watch the video, he leads off with rejecting junk science and superstition (I can only conclude that he means hard science and Christianity), but does he reject me, personally? Again, I’m going to give him the benefit of the doubt. Lack of understanding and/or agreement doesn’t equal hate. Can it lead to such a thing? Sure, it’s definitely going to lead there if we follow the likes of Fr. Martin’s attempts to manipulate.

Let’s look at one last quote, this time from the Brandon Straka’s video, and try to tell me my interpretation of it is off base when it comes to what’s going on in the Church today.

The Democratic Party has adopted the deleterious belief system happily and without skepticism separating people into groups based off of identity and then organizing them into camps of victims and oppressors.  If you are a person of color, an LGBT person, a woman, or an American immigrant, the Democratic Party wants you to know you are a victim and destined to stay that way. They will insist that you are a victim doomed to exist in a system that is rigged against you, that you are a victim of systemic oppression, that you are a victim of your circumstances and that no amount of hard work or motivational action will every allow you to overcome your victimhood or the privilege of those around you. This is perhaps the Democratic Party’s greatest and most insidious lie.

But if you are a minority in America today, the left-wing politicians and the liberal media don’t want you to ever discover this lie. So they bombard us with stories designed to reinforce the narrative that you are in danger, that you cannot succeed. They manipulate your fears and concerns by telling you that you are disadvantaged, disempowered, and disposable to everyone except them. They will tell you that you need them. They will tell you that you are only safe under their supervision.  They will promise to liberate you from all that chains you. And then, they will do absolutely nothing for you.

And now for the “Martinized” version:

The liberal, dissident Catholics have adopted the deleterious belief system happily and without skepticism separating people into groups based off of identity and then organizing them into camps of victims and oppressors. If you are a person of color, an LGBT person, a woman, or an American immigrant, the liberal, dissident Catholics want you to know you are a victim and destined to stay that way. They will insist that you are persecuted and forced to exist in a Church that is rigged against you, that you are a victim of systemic oppression, that you are a victim of your circumstances (because you were born this way) and that no amount of hard prayer or the sacraments will every allow you to carry your cross with the rest of the faithful. You are different and separate from all the rest. This is perhaps the liberal, dissident Catholic’s greatest and most insidious lie.

But if you are a person suffering in the Church today, the liberal, dissident Catholics and the liberal catholic media don’t want you to ever discover this lie. So they bombard us with stories designed to reinforce the narrative that you are persecuted, that you cannot possibly bear your cross. They manipulate your fears and concerns by telling you that you are disadvantaged, disempowered, and disposable to everyone except them. They will tell you that you need them. They will tell you that you are only safe under their supervision.  They will promise to liberate you from all that chains you. And then, they will do absolutely nothing for you.

Tell me this isn’t exactly what Fr. Martin his club does on a regular basis! It’s time for the revolution against this pathetic predatory practice.  #WalkAwayFromFrMartin #WalkAwayFromTheBridge #RunToTheChurch


NOW Can Somebody Silence Fr. Reese?!

With some people, you just know you’re going to cringe when you read their writings. Fr. Thomas Reese (I love how he doesn’t even use the “father” part) is one of those people.  How one person can consistently get it so wrong is beyond me. This one, however, really takes the heretical cake.

Irish vote shows need for new pro-life strategy

By Thomas Reese  | May 27, 2018

 (RNS) — The overwhelming vote in Ireland in favor of allowing access to abortion shows that the pro-life movement needs a new strategy. Trying to preserve anti-abortion laws or trying to reverse the legalization of abortion is simply not working.

Yeah, this probably has nothing to do with the fact that the Church in Ireland has screwed it up so badly that barely anyone practices their faith anymore. But, yeah, let’s blame it on the pro-life strategy that’s kept Ireland abortion free longer than almost anyone else.

In almost every country where abortion has been on the ballot, abortion has won. Rarely have pro-choice laws been reversed. This trend is not going to change. To think otherwise is simply ignoring reality.

Look around America, Fr. Reese. The tide is turning, albeit slowly. We’ve made some great strides in the past year. I know it’s killing you, because you’ve been suggesting that we vote for death on a fairly regular basis, and instead spout out ridiculous ideas like helping the poor is more important than trying to stop the slaughter of innocents, all the while acting as if nobody is trying to help the poor. If nobody is taking care of the poor and downtrodden, then it’s likely the problem is the evangelization of the people in the pews by people like you, not the pro-lifers who usually are doing multiple things at once.  While people certainly have focused on the issue where they can do the most good, I rarely run across a pro-lifer who doesn’t advocate taking care of the poor as well.

The American pro-life movement still holds out hope that the U.S. Supreme Court will reverse Roe v. Wade, but even if that does happen, most Americans will still live in states where abortion is legal. Those who don’t will be able to travel to a state where it is, just as Irish women have long traveled to Britain.

So you’re saying we shouldn’t have hope? I thought with God all things are possible?  Seriously, if we can’t hope for the end of the slaughter of innocents, why should we hope for the poor, the sick, the imprisoned, etc., to be taken care of, “Father”? Why should David have ever beaten Goliath? Honestly, your reasoning on the matter is why the Church fails.  It’s not because of the pro-lifers. Your idea is to give up the fight because “one can’t possibly win this.” Is that what the slavery abolitionists thought? You’re far more like the disciples who walked away than you are like Christ.

The reality is that most Americans think that abortion should be legal even if they think it is immoral. There is no indication that this thinking will change. In fact, opinion is moving in the opposite direction, thanks to the attitudes of younger generations. The Pew Research Center shows Americans under 50 are more likely than their elders to support abortion in all or most cases. Likewise, in Ireland, younger people voted more strongly to change the law. Time is on the side of the pro-choice movement.

Pope Benedict XVI has famously said, “Truth is not decided by a majority vote.”. Not too surprised this does not roll off your tongue. You don’t give in to what’s evil. You fight for what is right, good, and true.

If making abortion illegal is an impossible goal, what should be the pro-life strategy for the foreseeable future?

The answer is simple and obvious: Work to reduce the number of abortions.

And the pro-life movement has accomplished that, but it’s not the ultimate goal. The ultimate goal is to reveal the truth of the atrocity of abortion and save women and their babies – ALL OF THEM!

When women are asked why they are having an abortion, the main reasons given are that having a baby would interfere with their education, their work or their ability to care for the children they are already raising, or that they simply cannot afford another child at the time.

The main reasons? Really? Yeah, kind of evident you don’t spend much time fighting it.  Try: they are terrified of going it alone and afraid of what people will think. This is why a good chunk of fighting abortion has been to provide support to these women and to make sure they are not going it alone. It’s clueless to think that the pro-life activists simply seek to change laws. This is the pro-abortion line of thinking. They never point to the actual help of the Catholic Church, Gabriel Projects, crisis pregnancy centers, crisis nurseries, those pushing to help student moms, etc., etc., etc.

Pro-life activists must take these reasons into consideration when developing a new strategy.

Pro-life advocates should strongly support programs that give women a real choice — increasing the minimum wage, free or affordable day care for working and student moms, free or affordable health care for mothers and their children, parental leave programs, education and job-training programs, income and food supplements, etc.

Yeah, because we never, never do that. Duh. Thanks, Fr. Reese. What would we do without your pearls of wisdom? 

In short, the pro-life movement must support any program that lessens the burden on mothers and their children.

Really? Any program? Complete bunk. We do not need to support “any program” that does this. We only need to support ones that are ethical and moral in all of their programs. And, oh yeah, we do.

No longer should Republicans be allowed to call themselves pro-life if they vote down programs that would help mothers and their children. In the early 1990s, Republicans in the New Jersey Legislature voted not to increase benefits for women on welfare if they have additional children. Thus, a mother with two children would have to take care of three with no increase in support. The consequences were quick and predictable: an increase in the number of abortions among women on welfare.

OK, a few things here. Let’s look at this case of which he speaks. http://articles.latimes.com/1992-01-22/news/mn-513_1_welfare-recipients

Let’s knock out the first fallacy of Fr. Reese: “Republicans can’t call themselves pro-life if they vote down programs that would help mothers and their children.”  (Insert big buzzer sound). If Democrats wanted to attach birth control and abortion to legislation for such programs, they most certainly can. In fact, Democrats love attaching evil onto other plans just so they can get that evil passed. That’s why Republicans often fight for line item vetoes and “clean” bills which don’t have things like Planned Parenthood funding attached to them.

Then there’s Fr. Reese’s next fallacy:

If abortion is never going to be illegal, pro-lifers must consider voting for candidates, even pro-choice Democrats, who will reduce the number of abortions by supporting programs that help mothers and their children. It is no accident that the number of abortions went down during the two most recent Democratic administrations, according to the CDC. (Clinton: 1,330,414 abortions in 1993 to 857,457 in 2000; Obama: 789,217 in 2009 to 652,639 in 2014).

Pro-life voters must choose between Republican rhetoric and Democratic results.

Wow! This one is a whopper. Even liberal snopes.com called this a falsehood:  https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/abortion-rates-presidencies/  Not only that, the Guttmacher Institute (Planned Parenthood’s research arm, even if they say they’ve parted ways) gives quite a different explanation of why the trend is down: 

Twenty-two states enacted 70 abortion restrictions during 2013. This makes 2013 second only to 2011 in the number of new abortion restrictions enacted in a single year. To put recent trends in even sharper relief, 205 abortion restrictions were enacted over the past three years (2011–2013), but just 189 were enacted during the entire previous decade (2001–2010).

Totally contradicts your premise, Fr. Reese, that abortion has gone down because of social services enacted under Democratic regimes. Oops.

Churches must also step up. In today’s world, an unwed woman willing to give birth should be treated as a hero, not a whore. She is not the only unmarried woman in her age group who got pregnant, let alone the only person having sex. Yet, she is the one brave enough to choose life. Shame on the Pharisees who try to shame her.

I have mixed feelings about this comment. How about not treating the woman as a hero or a whore but simply as someone who needs help? Choosing the scary and hard path is a heroic act, and certainly not making a child pay for life’s mistakes is a laudable move.  The big question is, who is trying to shame her? It ain’t the pro-lifers. In fact, you’re going to find far more shaming and fear-mongering going on in the pro-abortion Democratic world than you are in the pro-life world. 

Schools, too, must do more to help these women. Universities today talk much about diversity, but one of the most underrepresented groups on campuses is single mothers. Universities, especially Catholic universities, must design programs and housing to meet their needs. Such programs would benefit not only the mothers and their children but also other students. Perhaps they’d learn that “it takes a dorm to raise a child.”

While I don’t want a dorm raising anyone’s child (they can barely creep out of their safe-spaces), I do support directing women to help, and there certainly is help. That said, when the world is so intent on telling them what they can’t possibly do, they fail to provide any real alternatives to killing their child. Seriously, sometimes all it takes is a pastor who is spending a little more time giving real, moral, viable alternatives than “vote for Democrats and everything will be great,” like the pastor in this story did: https://wsvn.com/news/us-world/mother-of-5-overcomes-obstacles-graduates-with-honors-from-law-school/ This is a lot of what crisis pregnancy centers, Gabriel Projects, and similar groups do. They connect women with the resources they need to take care of themselves AND their children.

Besides supporting programs to help mothers and children, the pro-life movement also has to support birth control as a means of avoiding unwanted pregnancies. Planned pregnancies do not get aborted; many unplanned pregnancies do.

Oh my gosh! Well, kudos for just coming out and saying it, Fr. Reese! While still evil, it’s almost refreshing than the typical beating around the bush that your partners in crime do all the time. Unbelievable. He’s not going to be silenced for this load of evil?  Wow.  Good job, Jesuits. This guy just pitched for Satan, but you’re all going to look anywhere but at him.

Those who consider artificial contraception to be wrong must also recognize that abortion is a greater evil. When forced to choose, one must choose the lesser of two evils.

No. No. No. And no! You’re going to really try to go with “Let’s do evil so that good might come of it?” You can’t stop evil by committing evil. Catholic 101. Common sense 101. Just so people can’t claim Fr. Reese isn’t peddling a load of hooey…

From the Catechism of the Catholic Church:

1759 “An evil action cannot be justified by reference to a good intention” (cf. St. Thomas Aquinas, Dec. praec. 6). The end does not justify the means.

1760 A morally good act requires the goodness of its object, of its end, and of its circumstances together.

1761 There are concrete acts that it is always wrong to choose, because their choice entails a disorder of the will, i.e., a moral evil. One may not do evil so that good may result from it.

Using your logic, it’s just fine to target civilians if it will mean ending a war, right? Oh yeah, in that circumstance you will foam at the mouth, but when it comes to abortion you’re going to suggest that we commit evil to stop evil. Yes, it is the exact same principle. Artificial birth control always brings about death, whether it be spiritual, mental, or physical. There is ZERO way round it. And, hey, Fr. Reese, there’s actually another way to stop abortions. In fact, there are many of them that will have lasting effects that aren’t evil. And, by the way, we aren’t stuck with birth control or abortion by any stretch of the imagination. I’m starting to feel you have completely lost it.

The contraceptive mandate of the Obama administration will do more to reduce the number of abortions than all of the legislative gimmicks of Republican legislators.

This argument has been made ad nauseum since the dawn of birth control. Are you really naïve enough to think that a) abortifacients don’t exist and b) that there’s not a myriad of serious irreparable health issues to the users that you are pretty much now promoting???? Do you know what a SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE is??? Only one type of birth control stops those -abstinence. All the others do a poor job of most everything. So, yay! Let’s promote artificial birth control as the solution for everything, Fr. Reese, so we can see how many more people can be spontaneously aborted, scarred , and die due to the long-term side effects of artificial birth control. Can you really be this much of an idiot? THESE are the results of trying to stop one evil with another and this is what you’re promoting for society. Banner.

If European Catholic institutions can pay money into national health programs that perform abortions, then American Catholic employers can pay for insurance programs that pay for birth control.

People can do all sorts of stupid things. This doesn’t make them moral, just, or sane.

And while I would be happy to see Planned Parenthood put out of business, closing clinics that provide health care and birth control to women before replacements are up and running is irresponsible and counterproductive.

Planned Parenthood is totally and utterly unneeded and irrelevant. There are far more free health clinics that are truly helping people with diseases and screenings than Planned Parenthood ever did without trying to cause more of them. That’s what Planned Parenthood does, it creates new clients. Their business model is the bomb. Evil but brilliant. You’re either brainwashed, stupid, or evil here, Father. Which is it? All three?

The goal of supporting mothers and children and decreasing the number of unplanned pregnancies should receive bipartisan support. While many people doubtless support these programs as ends in themselves, there is no reason the pro-life movement should not support them as means of reducing abortions.

First of all, pro-lifers do support decreasing unplanned pregnancies and supporting mothers and their children. We just don’t believe in doing it by giving a woman a loaded revolver and telling her to pull the trigger. That’s you.

The number of abortions in the United States peaked in 1990 at 1,429,247. Working together, we could reasonably get abortions down to under 100,000 per year — far too many, but an achievable goal and better than where we are today.

Maybe if all of our priests instead taught the Truth we’d achieve something. There’s something that hasn’t been tried.  Unfortunately, as long as the likes of you are allowed to run unchecked by your order, we won’t know. #silenceThomasReeseSJ #CatholicCyberMilitia #reformtheJesuits

The Tiber Swim Team is Calling!

You know it’s really a week when I have to defend a Baptist artist.  Dear Baptist congregants, this depiction of Christ is what Catholics would call “Touchdown Jesus.”  It really doesn’t represent Catholic in a Catholic Church because, despite those who depict “Touchdown Jesus” in their churches, the big “C” Church prefers the depiction of Christ’s ultimate sacrifice on the cross as our primary depiction in the Church.  So, rest easy.  You’re not being too Catholic.  That said, there’s a bit of snowflake-ism found lately in the Baptist church. Let’s give it a look…


Jesus statue it deems too ‘Catholic’


A Baptist church in South Carolina plans to remove a hand-carved statue of Jesus Christ because some congregants believe it’s too “Catholic” for their place of worship.

The hand-carved, 7-foot (2-meter) statue and accompanying reliefs depicting scenes from Christ’s life have been displayed outside Red Bank Baptist Church in Lexington for a decade.

But in a letter to the artist, Pastor Jeff Wright said the art would be removed this week.

“We have discovered that there are people that view the art as Catholic in nature,” Wright wrote in the letter to Delbert Baker Jr. A friend of Baker’s posted the letter on Facebook.”


Got that?  There’s closet Catholicism in their midst.  It appears that it’s just art in general that is offensive.  It’s been there for 10 years but, suddenly, it’s Catholic.  Silly.

Wright wrote that the statue and reliefs bring into question “the theology and core values of Red Bank Baptist Church,” but he didn’t elaborate.

Well, I’d think you might possibly want to elaborate.  Honestly, it can only be the “graven images” as far as I can tell.  At this point I might remind the Baptists that God, Himself, designed the Ark of the Covenant.  He told the Israelites to carve angels, etc.  Duh.  There’s your Baptist snowflake-ism, people.  Someone is triggered by a depiction of Christ.

The pastor did not return telephone calls or respond to messages The Associated Press left in person with his staff at the church Wednesday.

The letter said Baker had until Thursday to remove the art if he wanted to keep it. If not, it would be destroyed. Workers at the church refused to tell the AP if that deadline remained in place.

When did the Baptists go all Jehovah Witness on us?

The dispute is a symptom of a larger “dysfunction” in the Southern Baptist Convention, said Bill Leonard, a professor of Baptist studies at Wake Forest University.

“Almost week to week there’s another incident in which southern Baptists portray themselves … having convictions that look like bias and prejudice in the larger culture,” Leonard said. “The bias is so deep that they even think they have the wrong Jesus is in front of their church.”

Wrong Jesus?  Bahahaha!  The anxiety level must be on high over there.

In his own letter responding to Wright, Baker explained his vision of the art, saying it was meant to show Red Bank Baptist had a focus on Christian outreach.

“This is why Christ is represented as though he is stepping outside of the building, not just confined to the idleness of inner walls,” Baker wrote in the letter, which his friend also posted on Facebook. “Under each arm, the reliefs depict scriptural and historical events that we as Christians believe represent the life of Christ.”

The reason that has been given for removing the art makes no sense, Baker added, because a large sign out front identifies the building as a Baptist church. Instead, the explanation makes it appear that congregants are disparaging Catholics, Baker wrote.

Looks, disparaging Catholics has been in vogue for quite a while (some days that’s my clue I’m in the right place) but I’d think someone should be able to give a solid explanation of why this artwork is considered Catholic before chucking a lot of art.

“I was obedient to my Lord in creating it and after much prayer I must respectfully decline to take part in its removal,” Baker wrote.

Baker did not respond to telephone messages from the AP on Wednesday.

I always wonder why these ridiculous things happen but maybe it’s for one man to examine the truth.  Maybe Baker is being called to the Church.  I’d assume he’s Baptist after his obedience quote, but, through this one silly case of worrying about being “too Catholic,” Christ might be sending him an engraved invite..  We’d welcome you in a heartbeat, Mr. Baker.

Divine Providence? Not So Much.

Oh, for heaven’s sake.  This is just getting embarrassing. You’d expect this at a secular school, but now you’ve pretty much come to accept if from any schools that line the eastern or western coastlines of the United States. The truly sad thing about this case is that you’re almost positive it’s going to be a Jesuit school, and “Boom!” it’s a Dominican school.

Student banned from Catholic college campus after defending natural marriage

They accidentally hit the capital c here people.

PROVIDENCE, Rhode Island, May 23, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – The student who was threatened with rape for articulating Catholic teaching on marriage at Providence College graduated this weekend, and was then banned from campus and served a restraining order. This happened after he reported to the school being threatened with murder and subsequently confronted an administrator about her inaction.

“First rape, now death,” the now-graduate, Michael Smalanskas, told LifeSiteNews. His being banned from campus means he is losing wages because he can no longer report to work at the on-campus Barnes and Noble, where he planned to continue working this summer.

Yep, you got it. Catholic defends Catholic marriage, is threatened, and then HE gets banned from campus. Stellar move, Providence College. You’re standing up righteously for the PC initials.

The school’s Vice President of Student Affairs, Kristine Goodwin, obtained a restraining order against Smalanskas. The two have a history – it was Goodwin who encouraged students to participate in a march against “homophobia” after Smalanskas put up a bulletin board defending marriage.

OK, before anyone thinks the bulletin board was super inflammatory, like Westboro Baptist inflammatory, it wasn’t even close. Heaven forbid we quote Pope Francis. You just know what the environment must be for Catholics who believe in the teachings of the Church. For your viewing pleasure:


It should be totally shocking that one can’t defend and promote a Catholic marriage in a CATHOLIC school but, sadly, it’s not.

Goodwin now claims Smalanskas “glared at me for 5-10 seconds” after exiting “the line for communion” during the school’s commencement Mass on May 19. According to her official statement, she views that, and the following, as threatening:

Smalanskas telling her she should be ashamed of herself for refusing to act to protect him;

Smalanskas “lashing out at me…by email, in meetings, and via social media”; and

Smalanskas using his “physical stance” to “impose fear.”

“He is significantly larger and younger than me and he has, on multiple occasions, used his physical stance, glaring eye contact, and verbal confrontations to impose fear,” she claims.

Oh, my gosh. Make up your mind, liberal Catholic. Are you a feminist or not? How about, are you an adult or not? Put on your big girl panties and stop playing the victim. You are the only one who’s actually caused harm to anyone (outside of the PR nightmare you caused yourself). You don’t like what he has to say? Give him what for. Don’t play the helpless woman quaking in her boots, and don’t bring legal action against a student for having an opinion. It’s embarrassing. My guess is that you are old enough to be his mother. Act like it. Do you know how many younger “men” have given me dirty looks, rolled their eyes at me, or posted something derogatory on social media? Quite frankly not many, because they know a tongue lashing would come their way. Deal.

Goodwin admits Smalanskas has never actually threatened her. But when Smalanskas spoke with her about her inaction, “he seemed out of control” and Goodwin thinks he “lacked any judgement about the scene he created…While his words were not expressly threatening his actions toward me have escalated quickly.”

Don’t quit your day job for mind reading. He’s ticked. He has a right to be. And no, just because somebody is completely and justifiably ticked doesn’t mean they’re going to clean your clock (although it looks pretty darn dirty up there in the machinations of your brain). While I might not do it after receiving Communion (because the focus should be on anything but you), I might shoot you an exasperated look or two. I can definitely say that I’d be annoyed if you took out a restraining order from me and took away my job.  Like I said, you are the only one who’s caused true harm here.

Smalanskas, who is getting married on campus in July, is allowed on campus for wedding-related business, but must give two to three days’ notice so that Goodwin can work from home when he is there.

Well, of course you must give two or three days’ notice so she can go color in her safe space. Do they hire adults at colleges anymore? Gag!

“A civil restraining order was issued by the court after Mr. Smalanskas’ unacceptable conduct toward a member of our community on campus this past weekend,” Steven Maurano, PC’s Associate Vice President for Public Affairs, Community & Government Relations, told LifeSiteNews. “Because of the serious nature of his actions, the College has restricted his access to campus.”

LifeSiteNews asked what the unacceptable behavior was, to which Maurano responded, “A court would not issue a civil restraining order, nor would a college restrict someone’s access to campus, without sufficient cause.”

Bahahaha! That is rich! A court would N-E-V-E-R make a ridiculous ruling.

“Smalanskas told LifeSiteNews that the latest drama with the school began to unfold on the evening of Thursday, May 17. Smalanskas and his fiancée were at Providence College’s senior formal at Foxwoods Casino in Connecticut. Because they’d bought tickets late, they were seated with people they didn’t know.

One of their tablemates pulled Smalanskas aside to talk to him about the bulletin board incident, he told LifeSiteNews. Then another student who wasn’t originally at their table “immediately launched into threatening to murder me.”

“The word choice was ‘murder’…he persistently asked for my home address because” he said he wanted to “find me after graduation and stab me.”

Let’s just mull this over. Not only was this kid threatened, it was from another attendee of a CATHOLIC college event. Uh, hello! We’re going to have to guess that the person making the threat was probably a student. Way to go, Providence College. You can’t even get “turn the other cheek” into your students’ heads. I mean, I would think, somewhere in the students’ tenures at your college, you might want to get “stabbing someone is wrong” into these kids’ heads. I guess that was set aside for, what? Transgender studies?

Smalanskas reported the incident to campus security, who also informed the local Mashantucket Tribal Police.

On the morning of May 18, Smalanskas emailed Providence College President Father Brian Shanley and administration officials Father Kenneth Sicard, Kristine Goodwin, Steven Sears, and Gail Dyer the following:

Hi all,

By means of this email, you are being made aware that a threat was made against my life at the senior formal last evening at Foxwoods Casino in connection with the bulletin board incident. A student told me that he wanted to murder me for putting up the poster about marriage. An internal report has been filed with Public Safety and I have advised them to pursue an external criminal report with the proper jurisdiction.

Let me make myself clear: the College has had every opportunity to stop and prevent this kind of behavior, which has included rape threats and now murder threats. Your inaction throughout this incident has ennobled students to act this way. Every one of you is personally responsible for creating this environment.

The two students involved in this matter have been identified and I demand that they be barred from walking at our commencement exercises.

Michael J. Smalanskas

So let’s compare shall we? A school administrator says “Oh, Smalanskas didn’t say anything threatening but I know he was threatening me!” which somehow warrants a restraining order but then said administrator doesn’t jump to restraining order mode for the above stated actions where an actual threat was made.

Goodwin responded:

Dear Michael,

On behalf of everyone on this message I am responding to your email to acknowledge receipt and to assure you that Public Safety is, as you know, investigating your report.  My understanding is that Director Kanadanian offered to escort you to meet with the appropriate law enforcement authority in order to file a report, but that you prefer that he send the report.  I have also been told that a no contact directive was issued. Once completed Public Safety will forward the report to the Office of Community Standards for review. In the meantime, if I or others can be of assistance please do not hesitate to let us know.

Most sincerely,

Kristine Goodwin

Vice President for Student Affairs

The university’s Department of Public Safety issued a “no contact order” to Harry Veneris, the student who allegedly threatened Smalanskas, and told Smalanskas via email, “the Office of Community Standards will receive the final report from the Department of Public Safety early next week and will process the case.”

Let’s see. Smalanskas is barred from his job and the campus but Veneris just can’t talk to Smalanskas? Uhhhhh…

Let me clarify Goodwin’s “response” for you. They will process the case so slowly that graduation will be over and then all parties will have dispersed so there will be no need to punish Veneris. They’ll only leave the punishment of Smalanskas in place to make it clear that Catholic views will not be tolerated.

Veneris did not respond to a request for comment by press time.

The school “ignored” the report of a murder threat and there were “no consequences for those guys,” Smalanskas told LifeSiteNews.

“Both Smalanskas and Goodwin agree that after the commencement Mass on May 19, Smalanskas said to Goodwin something to the effect of “you should be ashamed of yourself. They threatened to rape and murder me and you did nothing.”

How bone chilling FOR GOODWIN! Rape and murder against Smalanskas? No biggie. On the other hand, “You should be ashamed of yourself!” is tantamount to threatening Goodwin and her loved ones. Again, please.

Smalanskas almost wasn’t allowed to walk at the May 20 graduation ceremony over this, but was permitted to after the school assigned Goodwin a personal bodyguard for the duration of the day. Providence College ordered Smalanskas to make no contact with Goodwin.

Seriously??? Bodyguard for the cry baby but the person who was actually threatened gets a restraining order? Brilliant, all involved.

“I was also informed there would be non-uniformed officers in place ready to haul me out if I pulled anything,” Smalanskas told LifeSiteNews.

At this point I’d have to think anyone with a sense of “freedom of speech” is rolling right now. Of course they had to threaten him because he might possibly make them look foolish. Oh, the horrors!

“In her request for a restraining order, Goodwin outlined two encounters with Smalanskas that she says prove a pattern of animosity toward her:

Incident one: During the commencement mass as Mr. Smalanskas exited the line for communion he stopped approximately 10 feet away from me and glared at me for 5-8 seconds. He was visibly angry and stared at me causing me to feel surprised, uncomfortable, and afraid as to what he might do next. I was afraid enough to tell my colleague next to me and ask my husband to meet me to escort me after mass . I was afraid and intimidated because of his facial expression, the length of his stare, and the venue[ . One witness, a faculty member, reported “I am still shaken by his anger and hate yesterday.”

OK, I’m going to play middle of the road here. If he took Communion as the opportunity to make a statement, bad on him. If she’s over dramatizing this, which she is, GET OVER IT! Communion is not about you, no matter who you are.

“Incident two: As I exited mass it appeared that Mr. Smalanskas was waiting for me. As soon as he spotted me he began yelling my name louder and louder. He yelled something to the effect “You should be ashamed of yourself Kristine Goodwin, Kristine Goodwin – they threatened to rape and murder me and you did nothing Kristine Goodwin.” The area was very crowded and I had a difficult time getting away from him through the crowd. He got louder and louder either by walking closer and following me or yelling louder. I was more fearful for my physical safety than I have ever been. He seemed out of control and lacked any judgement about the scene he created. I went to a secure location and called for help. While his words were not expressly threatening his actions toward me have escalated quickly.”

Could have, should have, would have. Seriously. You’re allowed to feel threatened by a 22ish year-old yelling “Shame on you!” but being threatened with rape and stabbing is just drama? Seriously? Un-flipping-believable! Let’s get real, Kristine.  ou were embarrassed. You were uncomfortable but you were, as you say, never verbally threatened by someone trying to uphold the teachings on marriage of the Church. That’s kind of the point. Those who are willing to subject themselves to pain are hardly the ones who are going to commit battery. Usually, those who actually threaten battery are the ones who carry it out. Let’s just admit that you are worried about your job and a lawsuit, as well you should. I hope he nails you for your assault against him and his livelihood.

It was these accounts, combined with the rest of Goodwin’s statement (available in the PDF below), that allowed her to receive a civil restraining order against Smalanskas and get him barred from campus after graduation.

“It’s ridiculous to think that making eye contact with somebody on the way back from Communion and simply expressing that her inaction [is a] disgrace would constitute those kinds of penalties,” said Smalanskas.

Like I’ve said before, I don’t think Communion is the time to pay attention to anything but Our Lord, but it hardly justifies a restraining order. 99iGoodwin had better hope that Veneris also gets a big old restraining order lest she be sued up the wazoo.

“The great…irony here is that I was actually threatened with credible threats of rape and murder, and [Goodwin] personally said, you know, the college will process this later, but she claims falsely that she is threatened” and then “gets a bodyguard, gets a no-contact order, gets a restraining order, and then bars me from campus.”

EXACTLY!  Embarrassment doesn’t constitute a threat.

“It seems that this has to be revenge,” he said. It’s “clear” that she has demonstrated “a pattern of revenge behavior” against me.”

At best, she is immature.

Smalanskas will have to go to a court hearing in 10 days “and that is my opportunity to give my side and let the court determine if they’ll extend [the restraining order] or drop it.

Goodwin also wrote that she is afraid because Smalanskas’s father “has access to weapons.”

Oh, my gosh!  Seriously?  I have access to weapons.  In fact, so does she.  In England, they’d be knocking at her door for steak knives.  This is ridiculous.  Likely this is Smalanskas’ last stand against the tyranny he’s had to endure for the last four years.  Paid good money for Catholicism and got slop.  Whatever.  If putting up a billboard consistent with Catholic teaching is some sort of form of rebellion at a Catholic school, I say rebel.  Somebody has to say something about the money that’s gone to contradicting the faith and leading souls astray for the last many years!

“She leaves it there but fails to mention he has this access because he is an officer of the law and has been for 32 years with a spotless record,” Smalanskas responded.

Awwww…lady, you’re awful.  There’s really not much left to be said.  While accusing a student of wickedly upholding Catholic faith, you’ve now also suggested that a member of a law enforcement family will be gunning for you because they’re around guns. That is PATHETIC!

 It was Goodwin’s decision “to wait until after graduation to investigate Michael’s allegation that a fellow senior had threatened to murder him for his support of traditional marriage,” said Dr. Giuseppe Butera, an associate professor of philosophy at PC. “This after Michael had already been threatened with rape a few months earlier. And she feels threatened because he called her a disgrace for refusing to lift a finger to protect him?”

May God Bless you, Dr. Butera.  You’re a voice of sanity at Providence College. Take his classes my young friends.

“That is the very definition of chutzpah and it is shameful,” he told LifeSiteNews. “It is also profoundly unjust and it reflects poorly on Fr. Shanley’s administration. As my plain-spoken Calabrian father would say, ‘the fish stinks from the head down.’”

Sadly, this is completely true.

Smalanskas wouldn’t say whether he would pursue legal action against Goodwin or Providence College. He said his main concern right now is that he is being prevented from going to work and therefore not receiving pay he had anticipated.

Sue, sue, and sue some more.  I’m not a sue happy person in the least, but in such a litigious society, it’s now the one who sues the most wins. You will protect the next faithful Catholic should you win!

“The whole thing is so bizarre,” he said.”

It’s not so much bizarre as it is un-Catholic.

“A representative from Father Shanley’s office did not respond to a request for comment on this story.”

Really?  Is anyone at all shocked by that?  I will say this, my Dominican friends are completely embarrassed.

The Rhode Island Center for Freedom and Prosperity is setting up a legal defense fund for Smalanskas through freedomfy, a conservative crowdfunding site, he said.

Donate, donate, and donate some more.  Do they have a gofundme site set up for their wedding?  Because they deserve a nice honeymoon after this crud.

Below are scans of Providence College’s banning of Smalanskas from campus and the restraining order, which is accompained by Kristine Goodwin’s handwritten statement.” See link above to see these.  Please take a moment to email Fr. Shanley.

You’ll have to go to the link to see those scans.  Also, can’t find an email for Fr. Shanley.  I’m sure contacting someone at this link will pass along your displeasure. https://president.providence.edu/


Keeping Those Kids Catholic

About the title…Made you look! Sorry. I don’t have the answers for that. I only have observations, guesses, thoughts, encouragement and trials and errors just like the rest of you. Ask me when I’m dead and I’m sure I’ll be able to give you the oh-so-clear hindsight formula. For those of you who think you are endowed in perfect wisdom in this arena, good luck with that. If I were a betting woman I’d bet there’s a sudden heretic on your horizon. God has a way of humbling us when we need it.

I got a Facebook message from one of my 20-something, convert, and young mother friends this morning saying, “This is such a depressing article” with this link. My first reaction was, “What’s a nice girl like you doing reading America Magazine???  It’s like porn for heretics.”  She’s new to crazy Catholicism so she’s still learning what to avoid although she admitted “Jesuit” should have been her first clue. Parenting advice found in America Magazine really should just be ignored as a blanket rule. 

Now I don’t usually do the “mommy blog” thing, but Mother’s Day is coming up so I’m going to take this one on.

What can Catholic moms do if they want their children to remain Catholic? Let go.

Kristin Grady Gilger

May 04, 2018

When you have children, everyone tells you that your life is going to change. They mean this in both the best and the worst possible ways: There are the predictable losses (lost sleep, lost money, lost time) as well as the wholly unexpected gains of loving a child beyond reason, beyond yourself.

I’ll admit right off the bat that there’s definitely lost sleep, and those darling little cherubs break things, ruin things, and suck the life out of you, but I’m not really sure I ever thought these as losses.  I thought of them more as investments. Every little dollar they wasted, sleepless night I had, and endless days driving them to and from whatever was something else that I could offer up for their salvation and mine. Did I/do I always remember to do it? Not at every single turn but I tried to make some blanket offerings now and then to cover my exhausted stupor. 

What people do not tell you is that your children are bound to make unexpected and sometimes bewildering choices—and those choices have the power to change you. Children will shake your sense of identity, challenge your beliefs and fundamentally alter who you are.

Anyone who has tried to pass on their religious faith to their children knows this to be true: You can be a good Catholic and raise a passel of atheists. You can be a strident ex-Catholic and raise a priest—like I did. 

I see where she’s going but, really, temptation only has the power you give it. (Kind of sounds all Catholic Jedi-y, doesn’t it?)

Shaken identity? Yeah, this one rings true in this particular year. One Mad Dad has probably seen me have a couple nervous breakdowns this year alone, but I wouldn’t say they altered who I was. They actually made it clearer who I was. I am a child of God who needs His mercy, love and care, and sometimes, I know you’ll find it hard to believe, I forget that. I always had a fondness for the story of The Little Red Hen, and “I’ll do it myself!” has floated around my head a time or two or a hundred. Still, I think we parents and children both miss the spiritually symbiotic relationship we have with each other. We are each others’ paths to heaven. It can be quite blissful and far less adversarial when we keep that in the forefront of our minds.

My son would tell you that I have had a big influence on him. He dives into the world in the same way I do, with the firm intention of changing it. He works out his thoughts by writing them down. He believes in the healing properties of tomato soup and grilled cheese sandwiches on a rainy day. But when it came to making the biggest choice of his life—to convert to Catholicism and become a Jesuit priest—I was left to wonder what influence I had had on him or whether I had wielded any influence at all.

I’m sure she hasn’t worked through her newly returned to Catholicism. As you’ll see, reading further, this is what she’s done. I’m just trying to figure out why America sees her as providing answers to keeping your kids Catholic when she didn’t even manage to do that for herself.

I will say this, I’ve seen many parents bewildered when their children didn’t follow the same vocation. For some reason, no matter how faithful they are, they see it as a slap in the face versus a calling from God. Different doesn’t necessarily mean rejection.  Sometimes it just means different.

Many of the good Catholic mothers I have talked to are just as bewildered. They did everything in their power to raise children in their faith only to see them adopt other religions or reject God altogether. Some say they were defeated by a culture that increasingly values the material over the spiritual, or they point to the rigidity of doctrine, failures of individual priests, sexual abuse scandals, boring services and bad music. Many blame themselves, although they struggle to say where exactly they went wrong.

And here we go. Would I expect anything less to be found in  America Magazine? You knew it was coming. All of these poor moms’ kids left the Faith because of the “rigidity of doctrine, failures of individual priests, sexual abuse scandals, boring services and bad music.” (The last one intrigues me.)

Those whose children remain practicing Catholics have some ideas about why that may be the case, but they, too, are well aware that things could easily have turned out differently.

I find it interesting that she didn’t list their magic recipes. After all, she’s very willing to point out where people think they went wrong or where the Church is at fault. I think most of us whose children still practice the Faith, at this point, would sum it up with “BY THE GRACE OF GOD!” because, yes, we do know it could have turned out differently and still could.

In a recent survey of more than 1,500 U.S. Catholic women, commissioned by America and conducted by the Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate, 73 percent of women who are mothers said their children remain in the church. Fifteen percent indicated that none of their children are now Catholic. The remaining 12 percent reported a mixed result: Some of their children are Catholic and some are not.

OK, personally, I think the 73% actually seems kind of high. What does “remain in the church” mean to America? Does it mean they’re in some sort of Christian denomination?  Is simply saying you’re Catholic enough to win that percentage point? I mean, I’ve seen some claim Catholicism like a nationality, but they only show up at Mass on Christmas and Easter and reject most doctrines.  Seems like a pretty useless survey. Yes, they’re all baptized Catholics, and once a Catholic always a Catholic, but we might want to strive for a little bit more.  How about next time you do a survey, America, you ask if their children embrace all the doctrines of the Catholic Church?

Those results closely mirror an informal poll of America readers for this article conducted by social media. Just over 25 percent of the more than 500 respondents said their children have left the church—a number that trends suggest will increase as the young children of many respondents grow up. Nationally, nearly half of all children leave the faith of their parents once they reach adolescence.

Umm, it’s like they didn’t read their own poll results. I thought 73% were still in? If so, how is it that “children leave the faith of their parents once they reach adolescence?”  Sorry.  Your behind being at Mass on Sundays is not an option around here. Rarely will a child take the Faith seriously if their parents don’t make it mandatory while their little brains of mush are forming. It’s not optional. In fact, I don’t care if they reach the age of 50.  It’s not optional. They’ll never stop hearing about it as long as I draw a breath. It’s not just a trivial decision to skip Mass and they will know it.  They may still choose that at some point but they won’t be able to say they just didn’t know it was crucial.

Creating a Catholic Identity

Many of the mothers who wrote to America sounded wistful about that reality. Kathleen Baxter, who lives in rural New York, said her youngest son stopped going to church during his sophomore year of high school. On Sunday mornings, he would stay in bed with the covers pulled up over his head, and no amount of cajoling could convince him to go to Mass. She did not take it well. “My first reaction was: I’m going to force him to go, whether he likes it or not,” she said.

Her first reaction was dead on!  Geez!  Some days I have trouble getting out of bed for Mass, too.  Waaa!  Again, we all need to learn to resist our temptations. 

She and her husband are now trying to let him find his own way, hoping that the example they set will tip the balance. Her husband is in the church choir, and Ms. Baxter serves on her parish’s pastoral council. Both serve as lectors and are involved in the adult Christian initiation program (R.C.I.A.).

Since you are involved with RCIA and other Church activities, I’m just going to assume somebody’s told him the Sunday obligation is an obligation and that it’s a mortal sin not to go to Mass unless some SERIOUS reason or illness exists. (I know it’s silly to assume such things these days but I’m going to go with it.) Bottom line, your son is going with mortal sin and you’re just going to say “I hope I’m a good enough model that he’ll come to his senses.”  Please. You’d better pray your sterling example isn’t the only thing your son’s salvation rests upon, because we all fall miserably short. Act like it’s life or death, because that is what we’re really talking about.

Also, I really don’t count on my children looking to me as an example. That’s why I try to surround them with as many other people who are not their parents for examples. I’m not delusional. I’m not nearly as cool as, really, anyone else in the eyes of my children. I’m mom. I am the proverbial prophet in my own land. The odds of my own kids realizing that I’m totally cool is slim to none until, maybe, they have their own teens/young adults and they come to realize it’s not a job, it’s an adventure! Remember how completely out of touch your parents looked when you were young? Remember when you realized they might not be so crazy after all? Yeah. Take heart. You’re probably totally awesome to somebody else’s kids.

 “I figure if I set a good example, maybe someday he’ll come back,” Ms. Baxter said before adding hopefully, “Maybe he’ll meet a Catholic girl!”

Well, if that’s not passing the buck, I don’t know what is! Yes, let’s leave it to the Catholic girl to make Catholicism mandatory at some point in your son’s life. Blech. Reality check, lady. I know plenty of Catholic girls who ain’t living the Catholic life. In a world where children have been left to raise themselves, “Catholic” is getting harder and harder to find.

She has reason to be encouraged. Study after study makes it clear that parents—perhaps most especially mothers—do have an enormous influence on their children’s religious choices. The vast majority of adults who adhere to religion were raised in households where religion was valued and practiced.

…and mandatory. When did parents start saying, “Whatever you want, honey!”? Can I just stop and say here that YOU ARE THE PARENT?!?! Would you ever tell your kid he could go ahead and just eat Fruit Loops unto his heart’s content??? Of course not.  (Again, let’s just go with a bit of supposed sanity.) You provide nourishment that’s good for the child, whether or not they like it, until they get to the age where they can possibly see the wisdom in it or they leave your house. 

When I asked Ms. Baxter about why she thought it was important to raise her children Catholic, her response was simple: “I was raised Catholic,” she said. Nearly half of the women in the informal America poll referred to the same thing, often using these exact words. They want their children to be raised in the same faith they grew up in. They feel the strong pull of a tradition that has defined their families, often for generations. Being Catholic is a big part of who they are.

People! Catholicism is not a nationality!!!! The Holy Eucharist really should have been the simple answer here but the blind are leading the blind and we can’t figure out why people are leaving the Church in droves. Tell them to “Let go!” and it’ll all get better?!?!  Ugh!

I’m sure there are some people out there reading America’s article and thinking it’s a great guide for parents. What is it guiding you to do? Uh, nothing? You need to educate yourself. Like most of America’s readers, I received a less than adequate education from Catholic school and early parish life. You know why I’m still Catholic? My parents told me about the TRUE Faith! Insisted I frequented the Sacraments AND dogged me. Did I always love it? Of course not. For many of those adolescent years and a smidge of my young adult years, I just did it out of duty and guilt. Yay for the conscience!  Persevering made me love it, because why? Just like everyone else today, THE GRACE OF GOD! I guarantee if my parents had let me choose to go to Mass, I probably wouldn’t have done it.  Teens are lazy by nature.  At some point, I actually listened to a homily for once. I soooo wish I could remember when the light switch turned on and I started paying attention, but I’m pretty sure it was probably around the first time my Faith was attacked. Suddenly the martyr stories I’d heard growing up became a little more real.  “Nationality” was no longer good enough. I had to learn my Faith. Persecution really is good for the soul, but you REALLY need to show the youth where it’s happening, because, for the most part, it’s pretty subtle. Until they see it for what it is, it can just erode the will.

That is certainly true for Kristina Ortega, a Los Angeles mother of two young boys, whose father immigrated to the United States from Mexico. “So much about being Catholic is cultural for me,” Ms. Ortega said. “I don’t know how to separate my Catholic-ness from my Mexican-ness.

Catholicism, for her, includes assembling altars for the Day of the Dead with her children and praying novenas after the death of a loved one. The family is part of a mostly Latino parish, another way of keeping the children connected to their culture, and the boys, who are 5 and 8, attend Catholic schools, as she and her husband did.

But the family is also intent on introducing practices of their own. “Part of Latino culture is that religion is something women do,” Ms. Ortega said. “It’s important to me that my children see my husband is engaged.”

As far as my highlighting goes…Yes, yes and yes. I’m from California and this is definitely true. Yay for her and her husband’s response to bucking that trend.

Both she and her husband firmly believe that a big part of being Catholic is not just believing in something but acting on those beliefs, something Ms. Ortega credits to her Jesuit education at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles. They know their family is, in her words, “incredibly privileged,” and they want their children to “see what the rest of the world is like.”

The Jesuit church they belong to sits in the midst of a public housing project, which helps drive that lesson home. During Lent, for example, parishioners leave the church to pray the Stations of the Cross in the streets of the community. All four Ortegas take part.

Ugh! It’s like nails on a blackboard hearing “Loyola Marymount”. Yes, yes, many of us are privileged.  I mean our poorest of poor aren’t eating dirt cakes, but when looking at the rest of the world, it’s also important to see the martyrdom going on. We are actually free to practice our Faith (for the most part) without recrimination. Many, many, too many are dying around the world for the Faith. We have such a gift here, but we tend to squander that privilege. 

Lauren Schumacher of Centennial, Colo., who has sons almost the same age as Ms. Ortega’s, is just as adamant about the importance of “doing Catholicism.” “You want them to know it’s not just about the prayer,” she said. “You also have to help those who are poor and help [your children] realize how fortunate they are.”

This is something she and her husband frequently remind their sons in conversation, but it is also something they put into practice in small ways, like visiting nursing homes, distributing blankets to the homeless and joining other parishioners who take gifts to disadvantaged families at Christmas.

Perhaps more important, Ms. Schumacher and her husband try to set an example by curbing their own materialism. “We try to live within our means. You can say that all day long, but if you’re not giving to the poor or if you’re living some elaborate lifestyle, it doesn’t resonate as much,” she said. “I work on my materialism so they don’t see me buying stuff all the time, stuff I don’t need.”

Great, but do your children know the doctrines of the Faith, TOO? I mean, Protestants do the same thing. The Catholic Church has always been helpers of the poor and I strongly recommend it, but we also share the Faith as well as food. We are missionaries all the way around, not just in material goods.

Ms. Schumacher and her husband teach their faith in other ways. They follow the rituals of Lent and Advent, using calendars to help their children follow along. They place the figure of baby Jesus in their Nativity scene on Christmas Day. Their boys collect statues of saints. The saints, Ms. Schumacher said, are a big hit, especially St. Jude and St. Michael the Archangel, who occupy places of honor on her sons’ nightstands. “Every time they go to the church store, they want a saint statue,” she said. “I have to rein it in.”

Bravo! Making the saints real is super important. They’re not just fictional characters to entertain. They are examples for us all. They are our friends.

But most powerful, she said, is prayer. Ms. Schumacher remembers praying about what now seem to her like “ridiculous things” when she was a child. “I think back now and say, ‘Was I really praying about my bad skin?’ But at least you’re talking to God. That’s what I want for my kids.

“You want them to know it’s not just about the prayer. You also have to help those who are poor and help [your children] realize how fortunate they are.”

And the Sacraments, Ms. Schumacher. Don’t forget those. That said,just forming a friendship with God, the angels and his saints on trivial things is a great lifelong habit, one we all need to be reminded of again and again. Everything should start with prayer.  None of us nails the “Catholic thing” once and for all. We constantly give into, in full or in part, the seven deadly sins, right? That’s why confession. 

Also, to all of the parents out there worried about your child straying here or there or leaving the Faith altogether, this is one of my favorites! We have our very own angels for a reason, but so often we forget about them or ignore them. Almost all of us have been guilty of that at one point or another.

I humbly salute you, O you faithful, heavenly friends of my children! I give you heartfelt thanks for all the love and goodness you show them. At some future day I shall, with thanks more worthy than I can now give, repay your care for them, and before the whole heavenly court acknowledge their indebtedness to your guidance and protection. Continue to watch over them. Provide for all their needs of body and soul. Pray, likewise, for me, for my husband, and my whole family, that we may all one day rejoice in your blessed company. Amen.

Back to Ms. Schumacher…

Each night before bed, her children say their own versions of prayers, which draw out concerns they rarely voice in other ways. “I can ask my 7-year-old about his day at school, and he’ll say he liked recess, and that’s about all the elaboration we get,” she said. “But before bed, he might say, ‘Oh, God, could you have Jamie be nice to me tomorrow?’ or ‘Please don’t let me have that dream.’

Sometimes these prayers prompt her to ask questions, but just as often, she leaves the matter up to her son and God, confident that the prayer itself is the comfort he seeks.

While the author has been trying to go the usual seamless garment route, the juxtaposition of the Baxters and the Byrnes, up next, is a good one. I mean, just off the bat, which family strikes you as having the greater chance of having at least some kids remain Catholic? The one who just hopes they’re a good example or the one who EXERCISES the Faith and makes their kids do it despite the adversity in their lives or maybe because of it? Not giving up the Faith when you’re struggling is a powerful example and, since we all struggle at some point, we can all show that example.

Sophie Byrnes of Streamwood, Ill., has three grown children she raised on the importance of prayer—prayer she describes as being as essential as breathing and eating.

She was brought up in a home where her mother insisted on the family rosary every day. Sophie says she remembers feeling a little resentful on summer days when she was kneeling inside the house while her friends played, quite audibly, outside. “But I always knew at a young age that your faith will help you in life,” she said.

Later, during an abusive marriage, Ms. Byrnes prayed just to get through each day, and she taught her children to pray, too—not formal, rote prayer, but the kind of prayer that consists of talking to God. These conversations took place at all times of the day. “We never left the house without praying,” she said. “If we left at three different times, we said a short prayer each time. Whenever we got in the car, we prayed to get home safely.”

The most important conversations, though, took place in the evenings as the children got ready for bed. Each of her children had a list of people they prayed for each night. One of her daughters got so caught up in the practice that her list grew to 50 people. “When someone got on her list, they never got off,” Ms. Byrnes said with a laugh. “It was tiring.”

She said not going to church was never an option for her children, but she does not think once-a-week Mass was the most important part of their Catholic upbringing; it was making God part of their everyday lives. Ms. Byrnes taught religious education and got involved in her parish and insisted her children do the same. They were altar servers and lectors, sang in the choir and went on mission trips.

“It can’t be just sometimes,” she said of the practice of religion. “What doesn’t work is telling your children about God and not practicing it by your own example. What doesn’t work is if you don’t make God real in your life and your children’s lives.”

All three of Ms. Byrnes’s children, now in their 20s and 30s, are practicing Catholics. She has seen seven grandchildren baptized—baptisms she no longer posts pictures of on social media or tells many friends about because so many would find it a painful reminder that their own grandchildren are not being baptized. “I’m sure,” she said, “that would be the greatest hurt in the world.”

OK, I’m wondering where the title of the article is going to come into play. Ms. Byrnes is certainly a stellar example and even one of overcoming adversity and her kids are all practicing Catholics. Why wouldn’t we just focus on her since she’s achieved the title of the supposed goal of the article? Notice, Mass not optional?  

Nancy Berube of Spencer, Mass., does not yet have grandchildren to be baptized, but she has been thinking about it. Her oldest son and his wife are practicing Lutherans, her daughter attends Mass occasionally, and her youngest son “professes to fear that lightning will strike him if he crosses a church threshold.”

Raising her children in the Catholic faith was extremely important to Ms. Berube, who once seriously considered becoming a nun. Her husband, although not Catholic, was supportive of her commitment and got involved in their parish as much as she did. Several years ago, he converted to Catholicism, completed an online Catholic study program, joined the parish council and began serving as a eucharistic minister.

Ms. Berube, meanwhile, has become an associate of the Daughters of the Holy Spirit, the order of women religious she considered joining as a young woman. The lay associates gather for prayer, Bible readings and retreats, and they work to promote a variety of social justice and human rights causes across five continents. The work gives Ms. Berube, a family physician, a Catholic community beyond her parish and a way to practice her faith in ways that are meaningful to her.

OK, what’s missing here? She’s very involved with the parish and her groups but there’s no story on how she raised the kids? It’s all kind of about her. 

Ms. Berube has tried to talk to her children about the central role that Catholicism plays in her life and that of her husband, but these attempts make them uncomfortable. Despite the fact that two of her sons are in the U.S. military, which “gives them orders all the time, they don’t like being told what to do by their mother,” she quipped. Besides, she does not believe in a “hard sell for religion,” and she does not want to drive a wedge between them and herself and her husband.

Really, the story doesn’t say, but it appears that the Faith suddenly is being talked about as her children are adults. It’s a bit too late to start that conversation. It’s a way of life. If you don’t make it so when they are children, you don’t have a lot of hope of getting it through to them as adults. It seems like she doesn’t want to drive a wedge. Honestly, I never get why talking about the Faith, if done with love, has to do this? I mean, somebody has influenced child #1 to be Lutheran. Has he severed ties with them?

So she waits.

“I find the church [to be] a source of great joy and would love to be able to share that with them. However, it has to be on their own terms,” she said. “They’re thinking people; they’re very moral and upright, and I think their Catholic upbringing has affected their sense of what is right and what you can and can’t do in the world.”

Waits for what? For the kids to stumble across Catholicism? A lightning bolt to knock them off their high horses? Miracles do happen, but sometimes those depend on our cooperation despite feeling uncomfortable about it. I’ve had so many friends give in to the trap of, “Well, I’ve talked about it but I can’t keep talking about it.” Why the heck not??? I HATE it when people say that to me. You’re their loving mother and father! Yes, you have to know the proper time and place and you have to pray to the Holy Spirit, big time, but you can have a keep having adult conversations with your children. Knowing you love them goes a really, really long way even when we do things imperfectly.

I think of the shepherd leaving the 99 sheep for the one and I always see that as a mother parable. The shepherd doesn’t find the sheep and say, “Hey sheep, what do you think about coming back? Oh, you don’t want to? Oh, OK.  See ya.”

A lot of time a shepherd’s crook is used to yank the sheep back. Why does that always get overlooked?!

These mothers have learned that we do not control our children’s choices; we only control our response to those choices.

And we can also very much control what we say to our children, and THAT is our responsibility. We can’t let their reaction or ignoring of what we are saying scare us from our duty to speak the truth. Yes, it’s not always easy, but sometimes we just have to acknowledge that and get to the truth at hand. On more than one occasion, I’ve had had to say, “Hey, this isn’t easy for me to say but I feel you really should be doing x,y,z, not doing x,y,z, should consider x,y,z, etc. BUT I love you and  you have to remember that I’m at fault if I neglect my duty to say something. You’re going to do what you’re going to do, but it just needs to be said and I can’t shirk my duty because I know you’re going to be uncomfortable. Now let’s eat!” Do we always do it perfectly as moms? Nope. Some days we’re too emotional, angry, forget to say a prayer before talking, etc. I know I’m not perfect. My kids sure know it and rarely miss a moment to let me know that in their own way. Still, we can’t use that as an excuse to do nothing.

While Ms. Berube waits, she considers what St. Monica could have done to make St. Augustine behave himself during most of his early adulthood. “He came around, and he was way more messed up than my kids are,” she said with a laugh. “But I understand her wanting him to be part of something that gave her joy because you want to share your joy with them.”

“Some other kid is worse” isn’t my bar. In fact, since everyone’s different, I think applying a bar is useless and stupid. What Mrs. Berube ignores is that St. Monica didn’t just pray. She showed her heart through her tears and she did tell St. Augustine what she needed to tell him.

From St. Augustine’s “Confessions”:

7. Woe is me! Do I dare affirm that thou didst hold thy peace, O my God, while I wandered farther away from thee? Didst thou really then hold thy peace? Then whose words were they but thine which by my mother, thy faithful handmaid, thou didst pour into my ears?

This next part kind of smacks of having your child’s vocation revolve around mom. That’s definitely something she needs to “let go.”

Letting Go

When my son, Patrick, announced that he had decided to enter the Society of Jesus, my husband and I were incredulous. “If you want to be a priest why not become an Episcopalian priest?” I asked him. “That’s the church you were raised in, and you could still get married.” I did not need to finish the sentence. Patrick already knew that what I really cared about was not some hypothetical daughter-in-law; it was grandchildren—preferably lots of them.

I have always thought Patrick would make a great husband and dad. Like his father, he is playful and loving and thoughtful. He actually likes to talk about his feelings, and he never asks much for himself. He is the kind of guy who will take your hand without warning and hold it close and tell you that he loves you.

No matter where he is, he notices babies. We can be in line to order coffee, walking through a museum or pushing a cart through a grocery store, and he will spot one in a mother’s arms or peeking out of a pack strapped to a dad’s back. His reaction reminds me of the stuffed toy glowworm he had when he was small—something bright and warm lights up inside of him.

He does not often approach these babies—that is too creepy for a single man, especially for a priest in these tendentious days—but you can tell he wants to. And when he is around his friends’ or his sisters’ babies, when he does not have to worry about what people think, he will get down on the floor with them and play like a kid and hold them so close it’s as if he’s inhaling them.

And? We always assume that someone who would make a good priest wouldn’t make a good father? Why? I mean, in reality, they are fathers to many. The priesthood isn’t a default for those who wouldn’t make good husband/father material. 

I know now that there was something else calling my son, something even more compelling than babies, and that is the call—the vocation—he ultimately heeded. It took me several years to accept his decision; I am still working to fully understand it.

Sigh. I’m not really getting any good insight from the long-time, anti-ex-newly returned Catholic here. It’s so interesting that the thrust of most of the article were examples of people just letting their kids do whatever to the detriments of their soul but the lady who has a priest for a son, who is presumably seeking to live a life which is God-centered, is the one struggling so much.

We have spent countless hours talking about what it is like to be a Jesuit living in a community of religious men, the spaces he seems to fill in the lives of other people and what he hopes to accomplish. I ask him—often—whether he is happy. And I have begun going to church again, this time with a lot less willfulness and a great deal more humbleness. I am giving Catholicism a second chance.

I have come to realize that, as a mother, I have two choices, and both involve letting go. I can surrender my son to a choice I would not have made for him, or I can acknowledge what I do not know and what I cannot control and walk with him.

Good on the return, but at some point you have to realize it’s not about you. It’s about God’s plan for your child and his/her salvation. Everlasting life or everlasting death. This is what always seems to be so crucially missing from this article.

Patrick would put it this way: Motherhood, like any vocation, is a calling—the voice of another calling us to something more. Sometimes the voice that is calling is God’s. Sometimes it is that of your children. Sometimes it is hard to tell them apart.”

This article also appeared in print, under the headline “Passing on the Faith? ,” in the May 14, 2018 issue.

Sigh. This whole long thing was a lot less about passing on the Faith or keeping your kids Catholic and a lot more on what makes moms happy and not so happy. 

Parents, I encourage you to live boldly in Christ and his Church, but live humbly in yourselves. This isn’t about our pride, our culture, our “nationality.” It’s about the salvation of our children. Are we going to do everything perfectly? Never, but that doesn’t mean we don’t try. Pray, rely on the Sacraments, and fight like hell to keep our kids from spending eternity there. If you don’t fill your kids heads with your thoughts about the Church, the world most certainly will fill their heads with thought about everything BUT the Church.

If your kids have left the Church and you feel like you have (or are wondering if you have) made mistakes in that area, tell them that! Share your heart and mind with them. Don’t beat yourself up. Pick yourself up, dust yourself off, and realize that all things are still possible with God but don’t be a passive player in this life. Keep going after those lost sheep.  #HappyMothersDay


Catholicism on the Runway – What Could Go Wrong?

Honestly, whoever thought pairing up the Church with Hollywood and fashion should be fired.  Did you really have to have much of an IQ to see that Catholics were about to be the butt of the joke again?

Yes, Fr. Martin’s all aflutter on Twitter as expected, but the ever-disappointing Crux has it as their major headline of the day?  Really?  Christians are being slaughtered, but the skin-fest for the Met is getting the headlines?  Banner move.

So, yeah, it’s as horrible as you’d think. https://bit.ly/2IkRiuA Thanks to those stars who actually showed a modicum of decency and would actually be able to make it into St. Peter’s wearing their gowns.  I suppose I should be shocked that those exist at all.  The brainiac who approved it all should have to take a picture with Zoe Kravitz and try explaining that to St. Peter on judgement day.  Geez.

What’s a million times worse than the to-be-expected indecent outfits at the Met Gala are the Catholic pundits and clergy who are trying to defend this.  Seriously, you people are a joke.  Just admit it was stupid and stop trying to promote schmoozing with the Hollywood idiots as “engaging the culture.”  Sorry, it’s more like getting into bed with it.

Somewhere the Church went oh-so-wrong in engaging the culture and, quite frankly, leading it for hundreds and hundreds of years.  Now we’ve got a bunch of fools fumbling for a way to get back to that.  It’s certainly not going to happen by pandering to a completely lost culture.  It’s going to happen by showing what true art is.

I also get a big chuckle out of those saying that the Hollywood divas aren’t trying to mock the Church, they’re just trying to celebrate it.  Uh, Rhianna?  Enough said.  And, really?  Nobody saw that coming?  The only joy I got out of it was that she looks hideous without bangs, just like me.  Other than that?  Just sad and yet totally expected.  I’d love to hear the conversation between Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi and her. Scrap that.  That might make me toss my lunch.

And before one reader thinks about saying, “I bet you’re embarrassed by Michelangelo’s work!”, don’t.  This has nothing to do with the beautiful human body designed by God and so wonderfully displayed all throughout Church art for hundreds of years.  It as to do with the degradation of that body. It’s not God-centered, it’s ME-centric. Or, correction, it’s me-centric with Vatican vestments on hand.  Again, take a gander at Zoe Kravitz.  Or, maybe not. There’s little left to the imagination there.

So, Cardinal Dolan, Fr. Martin, and all of the other super cool priests out there: you’ve made us the laughing-stock of the world once again.  #CatholicCyberMilitia

For the Love of Alfie

People! I’m getting a bit exhausted watching the words “brain dead” and “terminal” being tossed about by CATHOLICS! Geez! At this point, you might as well just euthanize us all now because we’re all headed for that plot in the ground, too. 

First, Alfie Evans is not “brain-dead,” although he might be considered so by some. I believe the worst diagnosis so far is “semi-vegetative.” We’re apparently not going to wait for fully vegetative anymore. You must remember the increasing number of supposedly “brain dead” patients who woke up in the middle of having their organs harvested, their intubation unhooked, or just waking up out of the blue. Clearly, science has not nailed this down, and not even an EEG is a good indicator of what’s really going on.  Regardless of this, Alfie doesn’t fit the bill of brain dead nor has anyone actually diagnosed him as such. 

Alfie definitely does have a neurodegenerative disease. Nobody denies that, but so do people with Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, ALS, etc. While all will likely die from these diseases, they are only terminal when the body stops metabolizing. My dad suffered from Alzheimer’s for years, but was only considered terminal the last week of his life.  Interestingly enough, if he had lived ninety days in hospice, he would have no longer been considered terminal. Go figure. This is why the Church has always said that food, water, medicine, and other medical procedures meant to treat secondary issues should be continued for patients with these diseases. We do not euthanize them. We give them palliative care. We can’t currently cure them, but we shouldn’t do things to hasten their death. What is palliative care? It’s care meant to relieve stress and pain in the body.

The one treatment most people are going to point to as “extraordinary” care is intubation. Quite frankly, it can sometimes be extraordinary care, but it can also be ordinary care depending on the person’s illness, accident, etc. Let’s say a person, like Christopher Reeve, has been paralyzed and cannot breathe. He is still very mentally with it, he’s still metabolizing, but he needs help breathing to take the stress off his body (because not breathing is rather stressful). Denying him that treatment would very definitely hasten his death. It’s ordinary care for his situation which, at that point, is not terminal. This is really where Alfie is now. For him, that would have been palliative care.  It was simply taking the stress of his body. The kid is metabolizing just fine. He’s looks to be a tall little chunk for his age, and his renal and heart functions are great. Might this not be the case when his disease progresses? Absolutely, but we don’t kill people with, say, ALS just because they need help with oxygen. What’s the difference?  Alfie can’t speak for himself and his parents are not allowed to speak for him either. He could very well get to a point where his organs start shutting down, he can no longer metabolize the nutrition, hydration, and medication, and he goes into heart failure or renal failure.  Oxygen would be totally futile at that point. We, however, as Catholics, don’t base treatment on what might be one day. For all we know, Alfie’s brain could suddenly stop getting worse. Yes, this is where he would be the rest of his life, but what we do know is that removing oxygen puts much more stress on his little body, and doing so was meant to hasten his death. It’s important to note they removed his nutrition and hydration until he didn’t die. After a while of him not dying, they started looking bad.

Now, Bambino Gesu has offered palliative care to Alfie until which time it is no longer conducive to his health. They have said they DO NOT intend on discontinuing the ventilator, nutrition, or hydration. What they DO intend is making him as comfortable as possible for the rest of his life. Nobody can seem to tell me why this is a problem. I believe the judge said it could be detrimental to his health because of possible seizures.  You know what’s more detrimental to his heath, Mr. Justice Hayden? Euthanasia. It’s going to be harmful to someone’s health one hundred percent of the time. Just let Alfie go.

Folks, you need to learn this because you don’t want to be trying to figure all of this out when you are under THE worst stress of your lives and, since life will be in the balance, you want to get this right.