Tripling-down on Accusing Greatly!

After Pope Francis tripled-down on his “Great Accuser” homilies, I finally got around to reading them for myself, and yep, they were as sad as reported.  I never want to take reporting at face value without going to the source.  I hate to say it, but after reading them, I get the feeling that Pope Francis thinks we are naïve, or maybe he’s just naïve himself.  Either way, he picked the wrong bible verses to latch onto.  Personally, I think it always a bad PR move to put yourself in the role of Jesus, Job, etc.

It also seems to me that Pope Francis also did what he was preaching to everyone else not to do.  In our Church, an accusation doesn’t get any bigger than accusing someone of acting like satan. Not one, not two, but three “shoot the messenger” homilies have been lauded by a whole lot of people who have been quite legitimately outed for the clericalism of their compadres who want to normalize same-sex attraction.

So no, Holy Father, I don’t think this is a Job situation at all, or at least you have GREATLY miscast the characters.  I think it’s more like a Paul and Timothy situation. I just can’t believe God nor Job would want the evil deeds of others hidden.  Do you?  Let’s look at Job.  :

Job 1:6-20

One day, when the heavenly powers stood waiting upon the Lord’s presence, and among them, man’s Enemy, the Lord asked him, where he had been? Roaming about the earth, said he, to and fro about the earth.  Why then, the Lord said, thou hast seen a servant of mine called Job. Here is a true man, an honest man, none like him on earth; ever he fears his God, and keeps far from wrong-doing. Job fears his God, the Enemy answered, and loses nothing by it. Sheltered his life by thy protection, sheltered his home, his property; thy blessing on all he undertakes; worldly goods that still go on increasing; he loses nothing. One little touch of thy hand, assailing all that wealth of his! Then see how he will turn and blaspheme thee. Be it so, the Lord answered; with all his possessions do what thou wilt, so thou leave himself unharmed. 

So here we’ve got satan telling God that Job only follows Him because he hasn’t faced any hardship.  Yeah, that has everything to do with Archbishop Vigano.  Sorry.  If Archbishop Vigano didn’t rock the boat, he’s probably be leading a pretty cushy life right now. So the character assassination is way off base here. Talk about hardship, he’s in hiding.

Now let’s look at 1 Timothy.  This one sounds a bit more familiar and applicable to the situation. Maybe it should be adopted by anyone who feels the least bit bad that THOUSANDS of people have been molested and raped at the hands of priests.  The “worrying about my image” homilies really need to cease. My comments interjected:


1 Timothy 1:3-20

There were some who needed to be warned against teaching strange doctrines (Sounds quite familiar these days!), against occupying their minds with legends and interminable pedigrees (Some are definitely legends in their own mind, like the ones who end in SJ), which breed controversy, instead of building up God’s house, as the faith does. (Breeding controversy is exactly what the likes of Cardinals Wuerl, Tobin, and Cupich, Bishop McElroy, and Frs. Martin, Rosica, and Reese do.) The end at which our warning aims is charity, based on purity of heart, on a good conscience and a sincere faith. (What?  Paul and Timothy aren’t the “Great Accusers” but there warning is aimed in charity, purity of heart, good conscience, and sincere faith?  Somebody else tell me they see the likeness to Vigano, not Cupich!) There are some who have missed this mark, branching off into vain speculations; who now claim to be expounding the law, without understanding the meaning of their own words, or the subject on which they pronounce so positively. (Do we not see that at EVERY turn with Cupich, Tobin, Kasper, Martin, Reese, Rosica, and a multitude of others???)  The law? It is an excellent thing, where it is applied legitimately; (Yes, the Pontifical Secrets have their place but, as Archbishop Vigano points out, they were never meant to cover up for abusing priests, bishops, and cardinals!!!) but it must be remembered that the law is not meant for those who live innocent lives. It is meant for the lawless and the refractory; (Hmmm. Lawless and stubborn.  That would appear to those charged in Archbishop Vigano’s testimony.) for the godless and the sinner, the unholy and the profane; for those who lay violent hands on father or mother, for murderers, for those who commit fornication or sin against nature, the slave-dealer, the liar, the perjurer. All this and much else is the very opposite of the sound doctrine (and which faction has been trying to promote same-sex attraction as normal and healthy?) contained in the gospel I have been entrusted with, that tells us of the blessed God and his glory. How I thank our Lord Christ Jesus, the source of all my strength, for shewing confidence in me by appointing me his minister, me, a blasphemer till then, a persecutor, a man of violence, author of outrage, and yet he had mercy on me, because I was acting in the ignorance of unbelief. The grace of the Lord came upon me in a full tide of faith and love, the love that is in Christ Jesus. How true is that saying, and what a welcome it deserves, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners. I was the worst of all, and yet I was pardoned, so that in me first of all Christ Jesus might give the extreme example of his patience; I was to be the pattern of all those who will ever believe in him, to win eternal life. Honour and glory through endless ages to the king of all the ages, the immortal, the invisible, who alone is God, Amen. This charge, then, I give into thy hands, my son Timothy, remembering how prophecy singled thee out, long ago. Serve, as it bade thee, in this honourable warfare, (And this is one of the reasons the charge of “civil war” doesn’t faze me. This is indeed a spiritual war for souls.) with faith and a good conscience to aid thee. Some, through refusing this duty, have made shipwreck of the faith; (Oh, yes, some definitely have done so.) among them, Hymenaeus and Alexander,(and Cupich, McElroy, Farrell, Wuerl, Kasper, etc., etc., etc.) whom I have made over to Satan, till they are cured of their blasphemy. (No accusing there!)

So, you can see between the two verses, there are valid accusations by St. Paul (I mean he even named names) and a supposition by satan.  Why Pope Francis even tries to go there is beyond me.  It’s like somebody whipped out a concordance and just looked up “accusations” then said, “Hey! There’s a verse that says satan is an accuser. Let’s go with that against Archbishop Vigano!”, but they never bothered to actually read the rest of the verse. To make matters worse, they then repeated it and will likely continue to do so.  I’m not sure that betting the laity will take anything on face-value is the way to go these days anymore.  Google makes it so easy to fact check these days, and people have messaged me saying “I was researching this scandal and came across you!”  People are fact checking, as depressing as it is.

That said, there is exposing truth and there is promoting lies.  These are obviously quite different. God is the author of Truth, and satan is the author of lies.  To say that putting forth truth comes from the devil sounds like something an abuser would say, don’t you think?  Fr. Rutler said it best in his interview with Raymond Arroyo:

Well, I’m a parish priest I am in no position to fault or correct the Pope who is the Vicar of Christ. I can only express what moral theologians would call admiration, that is astonishment, at attributing to the Pope, uh, repudiating to the Pope, imputing to the devil, an exposure of the truth. Now, I, the devil is the Prince of Lies the last thing he wants to do is to expose the truth so if the truth is being exposed. that is not the devil’s work. That is the Holy Spirit.

This is how most of us feel, especially the victims of abuse. We are utterly amazed that those exposing truth are being compared to satan, especially when the accusations have been corroborated time and again. Satan is the author of lies and tries to suppress the truth. His accusations are false and misleading.

Maybe the Vatican sound-bite creators might want to do some pondering on this verse:

Romans 1:18

For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness

And for heaven’s sake, can somebody in the PR department at the Vatican, at the very least, let the Holy Father know that the “I’m silent like Christ.” isn’t going over well here?


18 thoughts on “Tripling-down on Accusing Greatly!

  1. Look at never ending scandal in Arg. with Grassi etc., Under Ab Bergoglio back then. Also ,Barros in Chile. Inzoli Farrell and Daneels in Europe, Mahony ,Weurl and McCarrick etc.. Sadly the wayward Papacy of Bergoglio Cino Francis is disturbing to say the least……… They ignore the problem, blame the victims and try to denigrate the accusers.. Height of arrogance and stupidity to try to get Grassi off in Arg, by Bergoglio AFTER his Grassi conviction. Then B. F. Has the audacity to try to imply Satan or Jews for Maradiaga as behind the rising tide of condemnation of the do nothing people B. F. surrounds himself with in all this ,like foolish Cupich and Martin Amer. Mgz. etc..


  2. Thanks for your blog OMM.

    I am trying to fast for Ember Days and I’m being tormented by temptation to eat! I have never observed Ember Days before, although I always thought it sounded like a good thing when it was mentioned (which hasn’t been often in my life until lately).

    Your words are inspiring me to get through this hardship for the sake of the good priests. To ask God to strengthen them and to protect Archbishop Vigano!

    My hunger is being channeled into prayer!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I wish SOMEONE would address the fact that NOWHERE IN JOB is Satan called “the great accuser”. That seems to just be passed over by everyone as though Jorge has said something clever.

    Liked by 1 person

      1. Pearl, Madmom, I agree completely that PF usually miscasts characters when he bothers to pick up a Bible. But I just left a longish comment to say that I think I see how PF thinks he and his friends are … un-siftable. Beyond our reach.


    1. “Satan” means “accuser” in exactly the same way “Messiah” (or “Christ”) means “anointed”. These were words, not names, but “Satan” fits the fallen angel to a unique degree, and “Christ” fits the Second Person of the Most Holy Trinity to a unique degree, so in both cases they came to be used as names. See

      Liked by 1 person

  4. I too was thrown off by PF’s accusation that someone was being a Great Accuser.

    I thought the implication was that Vigano was accusing Bergoglio of sin; I think that may still be Bergoglio’s understanding.

    But, I admit I had never known Satan was called The Great Accuser. When I saw your comment, I dug around a little more.

    In Revelations, Satan is more explicitly called the “accuser of our brothers” who is finally overcome.

    Going back to Job books 1 and 2, Satan accuses Job in the sense that Satan expects Job will deny God, will curse His name and lose his faith in God, when Job suffers.

    More importantly, Satan thinks Job is not worthy of God’s interest or favor. Satan thinks none of us is worthy. Least of all worthy of Christ’s sacrifice on the cross.

    Stepping back to Zechariah book 3, we see Satan standing “ready to accuse” Joshua of being unworthy:

    1And the Lord shewed me Jesus the high priest standing before the angel of the Lord: and Satan stood on his right hand to be his adversary. 2And the Lord said to Satan: The Lord rebuke thee, O Satan: and the Lord that chose Jerusalem rebuke thee: Is not this a brand plucked out of the fire? 3And Jesus was clothed with filthy garments: and he stood before the face of the angel. 4Who answered, and said to them that stood before him, saying: Take away the filthy garments from him. And he said to him: Behold I have taken away thy iniquity, and have clothed thee with change of garments.

    Stepping forward to Luke book 22, Jesus warns Peter that Satan wants us to be tested, and found wanting and unworthy:

    31And the Lord said: Simon, Simon, behold Satan hath desired to have you, that he may sift you as wheat: 32But I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not: and thou, being once converted, confirm thy brethren.

    So perhaps PF is trying to make the case that Vigano accuses Bergoglio, or McCarrick, or various cardinals of being unworthy of Christ. Will McCarrick lose his faith and curse God as a result of this, um, testing?

    Does PF thinks Vigano’s accusations are merely the attempted sifting of righteous men?


  5. Saw a meme on the interwebs today… not mine & not sure who did it, but it was a photo of Pope Francis with the caption, “L’Eglise c’est moi.” I don’t know if Pope Francis really believes, in his heart of hearts, that he is the Church. BUT if he did believe that, I’m not sure his conduct would be much different than what we’re seeing. First, there were the suggestions that the God of Surprises was working through him… i.e., that he was some sort of special oracle of new things. He has gradually transitioned into more-or-less direct comparisons of himself and Jesus Christ, not-so-subtly comparing critics of his free-wheeling approach to doctrine to the Pharisees and ‘Doctors of Law’ who tried to trip up Jesus with their petty rules and legalistic minds. More recently, he has taken it up a notch comparing his own silence in the face of accusations regarding McCarrick et al. to that of Jesus in the run-up to the crucifixion. It’s really quite incredible, but if you do believe yourself to be a vessel of the Holy Spirit, or of the Body of Christ itself, and people are criticizing you and accusing you of bad things, well, it’s axiomatic to say that your critics and accusers are in the wrong, isn’t it? If I’m some sort of 4th person of the Trinity, and you’re hassling me, then you must be the bad guy, right? And that does seem to be the mentality that we’re seeing from him.


  6. Mom,

    Could I selfishly ask for prayers for my brother, Rick, who was recently diagnosed with cancer in multiple organs. No prognosis yet.

    But, also for myself as I undergo, around 9 am this morning(Aug 20th, 2018), urgent eye surgery for a detached and multiply torn right retina, which will result in blindness without this surgery. Due to the extent of the tears and detachment, there is no discernable outcome prediction until post operative evaluation demonstrates the extent and result of the coming repairs.

    Hope you and your precious family are well.

    Thank you and God be with you.


    Liked by 1 person

  7. Thank you. The surgery took about 3 plus hours.

    The exam tomorrow, with the Retinal Surgeon, will give some idea of the results, but due to the delicate nature of the eye, only time will tell.

    Thank you, sincerely, from my heart.

    Will let you know.


    Liked by 1 person

  8. Follow up on the eye surgery was as expected. Now its face down time for me for a couple of weeks and follow ups.

    God bless you all and may He protect His Church and Faithful Catholics, while either converting or purging all the rest.


    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s